Residential, commercial, and hospitality buildings within the ICT — the income-generating built environment. Revenue accrues through rental yields, sales, and occupancy economics. The most direct, measurable performance-linked revenue stream in the program and the exclusive deployment target for CIP.
City Bonds.
The Capital Markets Engine.
A programmatic suite of structured debt and hybrid-equity instruments designed to fund International Cities at speed, at competitive cost, and across decades — with Bitcoin appreciation embedded as asymmetric optionality. Modeled on Strategy's STRF / STRD / STRK architecture, calibrated for the private-jurisdiction asset class.
Capital, At Speed, Across Decades
Tipolis builds International Cities — jurisdictions designed for the 21st century, operating under Special Administrative Region frameworks negotiated with host countries. Each ICT is delivered through an SPV jointly owned by Tipolis and the host government, isolating project finances from both balance sheets.
The financing challenge is straightforward but consequential. International Cities require large volumes of capital, deployed with speed, at competitive cost, across long horizons. Real estate, hard infrastructure (ports, roads, energy, water), and urban infrastructure collectively demand a capital stack conventional channels cannot supply efficiently.
Equity partnerships are slow and expensive to structure. Government budget allocations are insufficient and politically constrained. Commercial bank debt is short-duration and unsuitable for the long investment horizon of city development.
City Bonds are Tipolis's answer. They are structured debt and equity instruments whose returns are tied to the operational performance of city assets, with embedded structured exposure to Bitcoin appreciation as an asymmetric component. The design draws directly from Strategy's capital markets innovation model — a programmatic issuance of structured instruments calibrated to specific investor risk appetites, anchored in a scarce, appreciating asset.
For Tipolis, that scarce asset is Bitcoin. The operational engine is the International City itself.
Every single capital raise across CB-20, CB-10, and CIP follows the same fixed allocation rule. 90% deployed into city assets; 10% deployed into Bitcoin on day one, retained as Tipolis corporate property.
City Bonds Are Revenue Bonds — With Two Innovations
For regulatory, legal, and investor-communication purposes, City Bonds map most precisely onto municipal revenue bonds in the US tradition: fixed-income instruments not backed by sovereign taxing power, but secured by the revenues generated by a specific project or enterprise — toll roads, airports, water utilities, convention centers.
City Bonds adopt this exact structure. The collateral is not Tipolis's corporate balance sheet, nor any sovereign guarantee from the host country. It is the income-generating capacity of the assets funded by the bond proceeds: rental income from real estate, concession revenues from infrastructure, service fees from urban systems. A 9% cap rate is used throughout this document as an illustrative working assumption for modeling projected stabilized yield on city assets; it is not a structural commitment and the actual cap rate will be re-modeled on a per-project basis. Each calculator below exposes the cap rate as an editable input.
Eligible Project Types — What City Bond Proceeds Fund
Streets, lighting, public spaces, utilities serving the built environment, last-mile sanitation — the connective tissue of the city. Revenue accrues through service fees and concession-style payments. Typically bundled with adjacent real estate to make those developments operational.
Energy grids, water treatment, roads, ports, railways — the long-duration physical backbone of the ICT. Revenue accrues through long-term concession contracts and utility tariffs. Maturation profile is the slowest of the three types but the most durable, aligning with 20-year senior debt.
The key innovations City Bonds introduce beyond the standard revenue bond model are two:
10% of every capital raise is allocated at deployment into Bitcoin, purchased on liquid markets and held on Tipolis's balance sheet for the life of the instrument. The reserve appreciates independently of operational performance and — for the CB instruments — its value at maturity is partially distributed to investors as asymmetric optionality on top of the fixed coupon.
Rather than one-off project-specific bonds, Tipolis builds a recurring capital markets program — analogous to an At-The-Market equity program applied to debt and hybrid instruments. This reduces transaction costs, builds investor familiarity, and lets the credit profile compound across successive issuances.
SPV Architecture & Credit Layers
Each International City project is housed in an SPV jointly owned by Tipolis and the host country government. Capital raised through City Bonds flows into the SPV and is deployed per the bond indenture's prescribed allocation. The SPV owns the city assets — land, buildings, infrastructure concessions — and the revenue streams from those assets service the bond obligations.
+ Host Country
Joint SPV ownership creates structural ring-fencing and political alignment.
Owns city assets and concession revenues. Issues bonds (or pledges revenues to corporate-level issuance — see §4.0). Allocates 90% / 10%.
Monthly distributions to bondholders; capex for city assets; Bitcoin purchased and retained on Tipolis balance sheet.
This structure provides four layers of credit support. As the program builds a payment track record, Bitcoin reserves appreciate, the city portfolio diversifies, and structural enhancements accumulate, the natural consequence in any functioning capital market is a progressive improvement in how investors price the senior tranche. Any formal credit rating that emerges is a market consequence, not the program's objective.
SPV assets constitute real collateral against which senior tranches have direct claims.
City revenues provide the primary debt service coverage at the modeled cap rate.
10% of every issuance held on Tipolis balance sheet, expected to appreciate over the bond's life.
Government co-ownership of the SPV creates implicit political alignment with bondholder outcomes.
The Product Suite — Three Instruments
The City Bond suite consists of three instruments — CB-20, CB-10, and CIP — each calibrated to a distinct position in the capital stack and a distinct investor risk-return profile. They are structurally analogous to Strategy's STRF (senior, high-grade), STRD (subordinated, high-yield), and STRK (equity-like, perpetual preferred).
- ▸90/10 capital allocation: 90% deployed into city assets; 10% deployed into Bitcoin on day one.
- ▸BTC ownership: the Bitcoin is 100% Tipolis property from purchase. Investor commitments (CB only) are settled in USD at maturity, equal to 50% of BTC appreciation on a notional 10% allocation.
- ▸Cap rate assumption (working assumption — not a structural commitment): modeled at 9% on the operational allocation. Actual cap rate is project-specific and may sit between 4% and 16%. Editable in every calculator below.
- ▸Ramp period (working assumption — not a structural commitment): modeled at 3 years with no operational revenue. Real ramp may run 2 to 6 years. Monthly distribution obligations begin from month 1 regardless. Editable in every calculator below.
- ▸Coupon rates: CB-20 at 6%, CB-10 at 10%, CIP floor at 4% — the headline parameters proposed for issuance, used throughout this document. Each calculator below lets you test alternative coupons within product-specific ranges to support sensitivity work and investor dialogue.
- ▸Payment frequency: all three instruments distribute on a monthly basis.
§4.0 — Issuance Entity: A Structural Decision Pending
A critical structural decision remains under active evaluation: the legal entity responsible for issuing each instrument. There are three possible configurations — issuance directly by Tipolis as the corporate parent, issuance by the project-level SPV, or a hybrid framework. This decision has not been finalized and will be subject to detailed legal, regulatory, and financial analysis before any issuance proceeds.
CB-20 — Senior Secured · 20-Year
Modeled with a 6% coupon, a 9% cap rate, and a 3-year ramp. None of these are structural commitments — the interactive calculator below lets you re-test the instrument with coupons between 4–10%, cap rates between 4–16%, and ramps between 2–6 years.
Structure. 20-year fixed-rate senior secured bond paying a selected coupon — proposed at 6% — distributed monthly. At year 20, the investor receives: (i) the final monthly coupon, (ii) full return of principal, and (iii) a USD cash payment equal to 50% of Bitcoin appreciation over the 20-year period, applied to a notional 10% allocation of bond face value.
Mechanics per $1M invested. $900K allocated to operational city assets; $100K deployed into Bitcoin on day one as Tipolis property. Investor receives the selected monthly coupon × 240 months + $1M principal + BTC appreciation cash settlement.
Capital deployment. All ICT projects. The 20-year duration aligns particularly well with long-lived hard infrastructure concessions (energy, water, ports, railways).
| BTC CAGR | Coupons (20y) | 50% BTC Gain | Total Investor Gain | IRR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% (bear) | $1,200,000 | $0 | $1,200,000 | 6.0% |
| 12% (conservative) | $1,200,000 | $432,300 | $1,632,300 | ~7.1% |
| 29% (base) | $1,200,000 | $8,092,500 | $9,292,500 | ~14.5% |
| 40% (bull) | $1,200,000 | $41,784,000 | $42,984,000 | ~22% |
Scenarios above use the proposed 6% coupon. Even at 0% BTC appreciation, the instrument performs as a plain-vanilla senior bond paying 6%. Bitcoin participation is asymmetric optionality embedded in a high-grade credit.
Adjust the coupon, cap rate, and ramp to test alternative parameter sets. All four outputs on the right and the Tipolis-side outputs update in real time.
CB-10 — Subordinated · 10-Year
Modeled with a 10% coupon, a 9% cap rate, and a 3-year ramp. The calculator below lets you re-test the instrument with coupons between 6–12%, cap rates between 4–16%, and ramps between 2–6 years.
Structure. 10-year subordinated bond paying a selected coupon — proposed at 10% — distributed monthly. At year 10: final coupon + full principal + USD cash payment equal to 50% of BTC appreciation over the 10-year period on the 10% notional.
Mechanics per $1M invested. $900K to operational assets; $100K to Bitcoin on day one (Tipolis property). Investor receives the selected monthly coupon × 120 + $1M principal + BTC settlement.
Negative carry is a design choice. Stabilized revenue ($81K/year at 9% cap) sits below the $100K coupon obligation. The deficit is managed at the enterprise level — by Tipolis-retained BTC at maturity, by CB-20 positive carry in the same portfolio, and by other operational revenues. The negative carry is the cost of high-yield capital access.
Capital deployment. All ICT projects. The 10-year term suits real estate, urban infrastructure, and hard infrastructure with faster revenue maturation.
| BTC CAGR | Coupons (10y) | 50% BTC Gain | Total Investor Gain | IRR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% (bear) | $1,000,000 | $0 | $1,000,000 | 10.0% |
| 12% (conservative) | $1,000,000 | $105,300 | $1,105,300 | ~10.5% |
| 29% (base) | $1,000,000 | $587,850 | $1,587,850 | ~13.2% |
| 40% (bull) | $1,000,000 | $1,396,250 | $2,396,250 | ~16.2% |
Scenarios above use the proposed 10% coupon. At base BTC CAGR, total IRR exceeds 13% — private-equity-level return with monthly cash distributions and a contractual maturity date.
Adjust the coupon, cap rate, and ramp to test alternative parameter sets. Investor and Tipolis outputs update in real time.
CIP — City Equity Participation
Modeled with a 4% floor, a 9% cap rate, and a 3-year ramp. The calculator below lets you re-test the instrument with floors between 3–5%, cap rates between 4–16%, and ramps between 2–6 years. Equity participation above the floor is uncapped and project-specific.
Structure. Perpetual preferred equity instrument with a guaranteed minimum distribution — proposed as a 4% per annum floor — plus direct participation in the equity results of the real estate project the instrument finances. Distributions paid monthly. No fixed maturity, no scheduled return of principal. There is no BTC upside commitment to CIP investors — Bitcoin acquired with the 10% allocation is permanently retained by Tipolis.
Return structure. Total monthly distribution = (i) contractual floor + (ii) variable distribution representing direct participation in the project's equity results. The variable component has no ceiling.
Mechanics per $1M invested. $900K to real estate operations; $100K to Bitcoin on day one, permanently retained by Tipolis with no obligation to CIP investors. Investor receives the floor regardless of project performance; distributions rise above the floor with operational results.
Capital deployment — real estate only. Residential and commercial incorporation projects, plus the directly associated urban infrastructure required to make those developments operational. Hard infrastructure (ports, energy, roads, water) is not financed through CIP — real estate generates the most direct, measurable performance-linked revenue streams.
| Scenario | Equity Participation | Total Annual Return | Monthly per $1M | 10y Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pessimistic | +0% | 4.0% | $3,333 | $400,000 |
| Base case | +5% | 9.0% | $7,500 | $900,000 |
| Optimistic | +12% | 16.0% | $13,333 | $1,600,000 |
Scenarios above use the proposed 4% floor. IRR assumes secondary market exit at par after 10 years. No BTC component is reflected in any CIP investor return scenario.
Exit mechanism not yet finalized. The working assumption is secondary-market trading. Whether CIP includes optional issuer redemption, investor put rights after a holding period, or a structured buyback program is an open question, to be resolved before any formal issuance.
The $100K deployed into Bitcoin on day one is permanently retained on Tipolis's balance sheet and is never returned to or shared with CIP investors under any scenario. This structure is intentional and serves a strategic risk-management purpose. CIP is the equity-like, perpetual instrument in the suite — the one with no maturity, no principal return, and the longest exposure to project-level execution risk. By retaining 100% of the BTC reserve from every CIP issuance, Tipolis builds a balance-sheet asset whose value is uncorrelated with project performance and that compounds independently of the city's operational results.
That reserve becomes a strategic instrument the company can deploy over time to reduce the business risk of the program: it can be pledged as institutional collateral to access credit facilities without selling assets, used as a liquidity buffer during stress periods, sold tactically to fund operational acceleration, or held as a long-duration offset against any underperforming project tranche. The longer the program runs and the more CIPs are issued, the deeper this corporate-level safety net becomes — and the more resilient the entire City Bond architecture is to adverse scenarios.
At 29% CAGR: ~$1,275,700 after 10 years; ~$16,285,000 after 20 years, per $1M CIP issued. Every CIP issuance permanently expands this reserve. The CIP investor gains operational equity participation in the underlying real estate; Tipolis gains a strategic, programmatic BTC reserve that strengthens the long-term credit profile of every other instrument in the suite. The two upsides are structurally separated by design.
Adjust the floor, equity participation, cap rate, and ramp to test alternative parameter sets. Investor and Tipolis outputs update in real time.
Comparative Product Matrix
The three instruments occupy distinct positions in the capital stack, mirror three Strategy instruments, and address three distinct investor segments. All values reflect the proposed coupons (6 / 10 / 4) — the calculators above let you re-test any of these.
| Attribute | CB-20 | CB-10 | CIP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coupon / floor | 6.0% fixed | 10.0% fixed | 4.0% floor, no ceiling |
| Payment frequency | Monthly | Monthly | Monthly |
| Investor IRR — base case | ~14.5% | ~13.2% | ~9.0% |
| BTC upside to investor | 50% of appreciation, USD at maturity | 50% of appreciation, USD at maturity | None — 100% to Tipolis |
| Principal return | Yes — year 20 | Yes — year 10 | No — secondary market exit |
| Monthly distribution (per $1M) | $5,000 | $8,333 | $3,333 floor → $13,333+ |
| Tipolis carry (stabilized, per $1M) | +$1,750/month | −$1,583/month | +$3,417/month (at floor) |
| Tipolis BTC ownership | 100% (pays 50% USD at maturity) | 100% (pays 50% USD at maturity) | 100% (no payment to investor) |
| Capital stack priority | Senior secured | Subordinated | Equity / junior |
| DSCR (stabilized) | 1.35× | 0.81× | 2.03× |
| Macaulay duration | 12.2 years | 7.0 years | Perpetual |
| Project deployment | Hard Infrastructure | RE · Urban · Hard | RE + Urban only |
| MSTR analogue | STRF | STRD | STRK |
Why Tipolis Must Build Its Own
Financial Infrastructure
6.1 — The Strategic Case for Vertical Integration
The City Bond suite is a significant inflection point. But the product itself is not the primary strategic asset. The primary strategic asset is the infrastructure — regulatory, technological, compliance, origination, structuring, distribution — that issues these products, connects with investors, and manages the ongoing capital markets program.
Any institution with sufficient legal expertise can create a bond instrument. The product is, in that sense, a commodity. What is not a commodity — and what constitutes a durable competitive advantage — is the distribution channel: relationships with capital allocators, the investor database, the track record of execution, the regulatory licenses, the trust accumulated over successive issuances.
If City Bonds are distributed and serviced through third-party intermediaries — investment banks, placement agents, compliance providers — Tipolis pays fees at every step. Origination, structuring, distribution commissions, compliance outsourcing, ongoing servicing fees collectively erode every issuance's economics. More importantly, the investor relationship belongs to the intermediary.
Building proprietary infrastructure transforms Tipolis from an issuer dependent on intermediaries into a platform that owns the full capital markets value chain.
6.2 — The Technology Inflection
Timing is critical and the direction of travel is unambiguous: the cost of building financial infrastructure is falling dramatically as AI reduces the labor cost of compliance, legal drafting, investor communications, and regulatory reporting, and as blockchain reduces the settlement, custody, and record-keeping costs of securities issuance to near zero.
Platforms that required teams of 50 compliance specialists can now run with 10 + AI-augmented workflows. Smart-contract bond servicing on networks like Botanix or Liquid automates monthly distributions, covenant monitoring, and maturity events. AI-powered KYC/AML scales identity verification at fractional cost.
The window to build this infrastructure proprietary — before it becomes table stakes and the differentiation disappears — is open now and will begin to narrow. Tipolis that invests today builds a capability that will be progressively cheaper to operate and progressively harder for competitors to replicate.
The Channel Is the Asset.
The Product Is the Commodity.
Any organization with capital and legal expertise can issue a bond. Any organization with access to Bitcoin can create a hybrid instrument. Any city developer can present a project to investors. What cannot be replicated quickly is a trusted, established, direct relationship with 500 family offices, 100 credit funds, 50 infrastructure funds, and 20 sovereign wealth funds, accumulated through years of consistent execution and transparent communication.
The institution that holds those relationships captures the lowest cost of capital, the fastest execution timelines, the most favorable terms, and the ability to raise larger volumes on shorter notice. Each issuance builds the channel; each monthly distribution made on time reinforces it; each delivered project validates the next round. This is what Strategy has built with STRF, STRD, and STRK — and what Tipolis intends to occupy within the International City asset class.
Benefits for the Host Country Government
7.1 — The Proposition
When a host country enters into a framework agreement with Tipolis, it provides the enabling conditions: the legal framework for the SPV, the regulatory sandbox for the financial instruments, territorial access, and political legitimacy. In exchange, the host country gains access to infrastructure it could not fund through conventional means.
The proposition extends further. The financial and technological infrastructure Tipolis builds — regulatory licenses, investor network, technology stack, Bitcoin treasury management — can be made available to the host country government for its own financing needs.
A host country traditionally accessing capital markets through sovereign debt — which carries the full political and fiscal consequences of public debt — can use the City Bond framework to issue Bitcoin-enhanced instruments for its own infrastructure. The same 90/10 logic applies. The government's infrastructure is financed by private capital at competitive rates; obligations are partially offset by Bitcoin appreciation in favorable scenarios; the balance sheet benefits from 50% Bitcoin retention on behalf of the state.
7.2 — Strategic Alignment
This proposition creates a powerful alignment of interests. The government has a direct financial incentive for the City Bond program's success — not merely as ICT host, but as a direct user and beneficiary of the capital markets infrastructure Tipolis has built. A government that has issued its own Bitcoin-enhanced bonds through Tipolis's platform has concrete reasons to maintain the enabling regulatory environment, to protect the SPV legal framework, and to support the program's growth.
Tipolis benefits through greater regulatory certainty, stronger political relationships, and the ability to demonstrate to international investors that the program has achieved governmental endorsement and adoption.
7.3 — Financial Innovation Leadership
A host country issuing Bitcoin-enhanced revenue bonds through Tipolis's platform becomes a first mover in a new asset class. The consequences are tangible: international financial press, regulatory innovator positioning, demonstration effect that draws institutional capital and talent. El Salvador's Bitcoin legal-tender adoption, the UAE's and Singapore's early digital asset frameworks — all captured significant institutional attention and first-mover advantages that continue to compound.
How the Program Naturally Improves
Its Cost of Capital
A central long-term consequence of the program — beyond raising capital today — is a progressive tightening of the cost of capital as the market re-prices Tipolis's risk over time. Higher market confidence translates directly into operational leverage for ICT development. This is a structural outcome of the architecture, not an external goal pursued through rating-agency engagement. Four mechanisms drive it:
Track Record Construction
Each successful monthly distribution, each project delivery, each bond maturity where principal and BTC payments arrive as promised. Capital markets weight demonstrated repayment history heavily. Payment discipline is the program's first priority in early issuances.
Bitcoin Reserve Quality
As Tipolis's retained Bitcoin grows in value, balance sheet asset quality improves — visible to any investor or counterparty examining the corporate balance sheet, including on-chain verification.
Operational Diversification
A portfolio of ICTs across host countries reduces concentration risk — a primary concern for any institution analyzing city-level revenue bonds. Multi-city programs distribute risk and stabilize aggregate cash flow.
Structural Improvement
As the program matures, additional credit enhancement: liquidity reserve funds, performance covenants triggering investor protections, third-party liquidity guarantees for the senior tranche, host-country first-loss co-investment.
The Virtuous Cycle —
Capital as a Compounding Asset
The most important long-term dynamic of the program is the compounding relationship between capital access and operational execution. They are not independent variables — they reinforce each other in a cycle that, once established, becomes self-accelerating.
Greater capital access enables larger and faster deployment.
Faster construction shortens ramp-period carry deficit.
Better operational performance improves coverage ratios.
Coverage + payment history tighten how the market prices the senior tranche.
Tighter market pricing reduces coupons, lengthens durations, raises volumes.
Broader universe enables faster, larger issuances → loops back to 01.
This cycle is the same one that drove the compounding capital access advantages of Brookfield Asset Management, Macquarie Infrastructure, and Prologis over the past three decades. They built capital market positions not through superior products but through superior track records that compounded into superior access, scale, and terms. The City Bond program is designed to establish this same cycle from the first issuance.
The Bitcoin component is an accelerant. In scenarios where BTC appreciates materially, Tipolis's balance sheet strengthens ahead of maturity dates, providing additional visible collateral. A publicly verifiable, appreciating asset on the corporate balance sheet — particularly with on-chain verification becoming standard — creates a transparency advantage conventional infrastructure bonds cannot offer.
Program at a Glance
The City Bond program represents Tipolis's transition from a city developer that raises capital episodically through conventional channels into a capital markets platform that systematically funds International City development through programmatic issuance, proprietary distribution infrastructure, and Bitcoin-enhanced return structures.
Three Calibrated Products. One Compounding Channel.
CB-20 targets senior capital from sovereign funds, pensions, and insurers — 6% fixed monthly, 20-year duration, senior claim on city assets, BTC appreciation cash settlement at maturity.
CB-10 targets yield-seeking capital from HY bond funds and private credit — 10% fixed monthly, 10-year duration, subordinated claim enhanced by BTC appreciation cash settlement at maturity.
CIP targets real estate equity capital from property funds, strategic co-investors, and local development partners — perpetual preferred, 4% floor monthly + uncapped equity participation, with 100% of BTC appreciation accumulating on Tipolis's balance sheet.
All three are structurally revenue bonds: secured by city asset revenues, not by sovereign credit. All three incorporate a Bitcoin reserve component that builds Tipolis's strategic balance sheet. The CB instruments create asymmetric Bitcoin appreciation optionality for investors. All three are designed for programmatic issuance through Tipolis's proprietary capital markets infrastructure, reducing intermediary costs and building a compounding investor distribution channel.
The host country benefits beyond its role as ICT host: the same regulatory, technological, and investor relations capabilities can be applied to its own financing needs, creating a Bitcoin-enhanced sovereign or quasi-sovereign instrument that improves fiscal position while cementing alignment with the program's success.
The ultimate objective is a self-reinforcing capital markets engine: each successful monthly payment improves the next issuance, each delivered project strengthens market confidence, each basis point reduction in cost of capital accelerates operational execution, and each operational success attracts more and better capital.
STRC as a Liquidity Cushion —
Monthly Coupon Coverage Analysis
11.1 — The Role of STRC on Tipolis's Balance Sheet
The construction ramp is the program's primary near-term liquidity risk: no operational revenue is generated by newly deployed capital while monthly distributions to investors are already running. Tipolis addresses this risk by allocating a portion of its own corporate liquid reserves into STRC (Strategy's preferred stock, NYSE: STRC).
Important separation: the STRC allocation is an independent corporate treasury decision made with Tipolis's own liquid capital. It does not involve any portion of the funds raised through City Bonds. Capital raised by CB-20, CB-10, or CIP always follows the fixed 90/10 rule — none is redirected into STRC.
STRC is a USD-denominated preferred equity instrument backed by Strategy's Bitcoin reserves — approximately $49B in BTC as of early 2026, providing 4.5× overcollateralization against ~$3.4B in outstanding STRC obligations. STRC trades around $100/share with average daily volume above $80M. It distributes 9–12% per annum in monthly USD cash payments — aligning precisely with Tipolis's monthly City Bond obligation structure.
For Tipolis, holding STRC serves three functions simultaneously: it generates high-yield monthly USD income directly applicable to bond distributions; it is a liquid asset that can be sold rapidly; and it can be pledged as institutional collateral for credit facilities, providing leverage access without forced liquidation.
11.2 — Per-$1M STRC: Maximum Bond Issuance Covered
Framed from Tipolis's capital perspective: for each $1,000,000 allocated to STRC, what is the maximum face value of each instrument whose annual coupon obligation can be entirely funded by the resulting STRC income?
| STRC yield scenario | Annual STRC income | Monthly STRC income |
|---|---|---|
| Base case (11%) | $110,000 | $9,167 |
| Pessimistic case (8%) | $80,000 | $6,667 |
STRC annual income generated by $1M position at each scenario.
| Instrument | Coupon | Max issuance · 11% | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB-20 | 6% | $1,833,333 | 1.83× |
| CB-10 | 10% | $1,100,000 | 1.10× |
| CIP floor | 4% | $2,750,000 | 2.75× |
Base case — $1M STRC at 11% supports up to this much bond face value while still fully covering the annual coupon obligation.
| Instrument | Coupon | Max issuance · 8% | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| CB-20 | 6% | $1,333,333 | 1.33× |
| CB-10 | 10% | $800,000 | 0.80× |
| CIP floor | 4% | $2,000,000 | 2.00× |
Pessimistic case — same $1M STRC at the stress 8% yield.
11.3 — Tipolis-Facing Interpretation: Issuance Capacity per $1M STRC
Read from Tipolis's perspective as the issuer, the inverted framing reveals the leverage embedded in the STRC liquidity buffer. Every $1M allocated to STRC at 11% generates $110,000 per year in monthly USD distributions — sufficient to fully service $1.83M of CB-20, $1.10M of CB-10, or $2.75M of CIP floor. In other words, $1 deployed into STRC supports between $1.10 and $2.75 of bond face during the construction ramp — depending on the chosen instrument — entirely from STRC income, without operational cash, asset sales, or leverage.
CB-20 is the natural anchor of this dynamic. Even modest STRC positions cover meaningful tranches of senior face value: $1M of STRC at 11% supports $1.83M of CB-20 face (1.83× capacity multiple). Even in the stress scenario of 8% yield, the same $1M of STRC supports $1.33M of CB-20 face. The senior tranche's monthly obligations are effectively insulated from ramp-period cash flow risk under all realistic STRC yield scenarios.
CB-10 is the only instrument where the capacity multiple falls below 1.0× in the stress case: $1M of STRC at 8% supports $0.80M of CB-10 face. This confirms the design intent — CB-10's negative carry is managed at the enterprise portfolio level, supplemented by CB-20 positive carry and general corporate reserves, rather than fully hedged by STRC alone.
CIP is the most resilient instrument from a ramp-period liquidity perspective. Its 4% floor means $1M of STRC at 11% supports $2.75M of CIP face; even at 8% it supports $2.0M. The capacity multiple is the highest of the suite by a wide margin.
The strategic insight: STRC on Tipolis's corporate balance sheet is not a speculative position or a yield-enhancement trade. It is a structural monthly liquidity mechanism funded by Tipolis's own capital, entirely separate from bond proceeds, that converts a corporate treasury allocation into multiplied issuance capacity. Because STRC pays monthly and City Bonds pay monthly, the cash-flow matching is exact and automatic.
For a fixed $1M STRC position at chosen yield, define a variable total bond issuance distributed across CB-20, CB-10, and CIP and compare the resulting annual debt cost against STRC annual income. Editable fields below are isolated — they do not affect any other calculator on this page.
Increase or decrease the total to find the issuance volume where annual debt cost meets STRC income (ratio = 1.0×) — the maximum supported by the cushion.
Submit a Question or Suggestion
Register your main doubt or business suggestion so the Tipolis team can review and address it in follow-up analysis rounds. Substantive contributions will be incorporated into the next iteration of this document.